Tomorrow, November 29th, my media deprivation assignment will begin. I am not very resistant to this assignment for various reasons. The forms of media to which I rely on the most include my cell phone, laptop, radio, ipod, and television. I am not completely dependent on these items, though I rely on them when available. Not having a cell phone is a familiar concept, given my track record with phone replacements. A combination of theft, water damage, and many forms of physical mistreatment resulted in the replacement of about six phones during my last two year contract. Ironically, my decision to purchase insurance the following contract prevented any need for replacements. Long story short, I have certainly been without the use of a phone for longer then twenty-four hours and am not worried about this assignment. I actually know that there is a sense of relief that accompanies not feeling compelled to check for text messages or missed calls. I am currently at home in Niagara Falls, New York. It is difficult to secure an internet signal therefore my laptop will not be a problem. I will turn off my phone and avoid the television. I will be working at my family pizzeria from 10:30am until about 4 o’clock. The radio is typically on during business hours, however tomorrow will be an exception to successfully complete this assignment. I believe that my location and other priorities will make it easier to avoid the media. I will soon find out if that is the case.
Well that was not as easy as I thought it would be. I originally began the assignment at 10am. I went to work at 10:30am and was supposed to work until 4pm. Pizza Time is a family business therefore requiring my siblings and I to be a bit more responsible. During the lunch hour, my sister called in to say she could not work the night shift. I therefore was to stay at Pizza Time until 8pm. There is an internet signal in the building, and I had brought along my laptop because my dad asked to use it. At 11:30 he was having trouble connecting and oral instructions were not sufficient in solving this problem. It was either help him, or listen to him curse at my laptop (which was not the problem.) I went over, got him started, and restarted this assignment again. I successfully completed the next attempt, however there was room for error. While working at the pizzeria it is necessary to answer the phone. I thought I would be fine until I remembered the “no land-line” rule. When the phone rang, I ran it over to my dad. This became an annoyance but enabled my escape from the device. There were a few instances in which I lucked out. My dad used the bathroom throughout the day, and ran a delivery later at night. If the phone had rang during either of these periods I would have been forced to answer it. It did not, I was lucky. The extended shift made the lack of technology very noticeable. Typically, when I have a free moment at work I text a friend or look at pictures on my cell phone. It passes time. I did not have that break, and therefore decided to catch up on some reading during the down time. When I read I get sleepy. I don’t know why but it is a problem that I have been dealing with for many years. After reading a few pages I would look around for something to distract me. I noticed that my cell phone acted as a welcome distraction while doing homework. Without it, I was forced to focus for a longer period. I mentioned earlier that I typically play music in the store. This was probably the most difficult device to sacrifice. There was no background noise, nothing to mediate my lack of productivity and silence. This was missed.
Using technology has become so natural that I hardly notice when I am using it. Losing these devices however, led to the recognition of each and every subtraction. With this recognition, I was able to keep an account of my thoughts and actions. About a half hour into the assignment I stood up from my seat and pat the outside of my pants pocket. This was to ensure that I had my cell phone on me. Right after this happened I thought to myself, “well that was dumb, you turned your phone off and put it in your room.” It was a force of habit. I had lost so many phones that I always make sure I have it on me. While at the store, I was opening and getting everything in order. I had stopped by Tim Horton’s before work to get a coffee and bagel. (Tim Horton’s is a Canadian coffee chain that is prominent in the Northern region and makes phenomenal coffee.) I drank my coffee, light the fryer, walked over to my bagel and paused before taking a bight. I ACTUALLY had to think about what I was doing. For some reason as I picked up my bagel there was a thought in the back of my mind asking if I was allowed to eat it. It was the same thought I have during lent when I’m not allowed to eat meat. There is a reoccurring thought whenever there is food around asking if what I’m about to eat is meat. This was the same feeling, however a completely different situation. I was able to get more reading done and had less distractions. With the radio off, it was obviously quieter. This had advantages and disadvantages. On the “pros” side my dad and I talked more. During the semester I am busy with softball and school, while he runs the store. Any down time that I have typically occurs during the late morning, early afternoon. This is the lunch hour at the store, and I know better then to call. Our conversation is therefore limited by interruptions and time constraints. It was nice to just talk and hang out, even if we were working. Conversation was also dictated by what we felt like talking about. When the radio is on I realized that we often elaborate on what the announcer is talking about. We also talk about the music that is being played or the artist. Instead, it was a day of undirected conversation. A nice change of pace. Plus, I did not have to worry about changing the station when a song came on that I knew would not be approved. I enjoy some rap/hip hop songs while my dad and (according to him) our customers, do not.
My experiences were very similar to those reported by the students at American University. I was more engaged in my surroundings and enjoyed the random silences. This enjoyment ceased however, after about the first twelve hours of the assignment. It turned into acceptance but toward the ending hours evolved into annoyance. The truth of the matter is that our society is extremely saturated with the digital media. This unending cycle of media continues in the background of our lives whether we are aware of it or not. Our generation has embraced this saturation because it is more efficient. Without my phone or laptop I was unaware for most of Saturday about the trampling and shootings on Black Friday. Cell phones and computers make communication quicker and easier. Our society has evolved so that the digital media is an intricate part of everyday functioning. While working at Pizza Time, I had no choice but to answer the phone. If I went to the mall (which I declined for the assignment) then I would have been exposed to the radio and television. Our society has become more efficient with changing technology. It is an individual responsibility to tune out what is unimportant and utilize what makes us more informed. As for entertainment…an ipod never killed anybody, although I’m sure Hollywood is working on that.
WORKS CITED
Walker, Danna. 2007. "The Longest Day." Washingpost.com
http://blackboard.umbc.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_37304_1
Monday, December 1, 2008
Sunday, November 9, 2008
Blog #4
A large criticism of Postman was the discontinuity of reality in television, and how it affected emotional responses. He felt that television breaks the habits of logic and thinking. Paglia however, felt that this “madness” was the same madness that is experienced everyday, therefore making television a better reflection of reality. This is the stronger argument because life is uncontrollable and random. We may plan ahead, however unexpected events often arise, revising our plans. The success of the “sitcom,” or situational comedy, is in the humorous portrayal of the unexpected. It takes the random events of everyday life and emphasizes their absurdity and often irony. In one episode of Seinfeld, a regular game of “risk” escalates into an intense competition between two characters. It ends when a Ukrainian man assaults the two on a subway because Kramer taunted Newman by saying “the
The remainder of this argument was how discontinuity affected a viewer’s emotional response. Postman argued that during a news report a viewer is told of a tragic earthquake, and then, five seconds later, the viewer is watching an add for soap. He felt this emotional transition was dangerous to development. Paglia however, believed that this shift required maturity. Sympathizing with every disaster would leave a person emotionally crippled. Everyday we are reminded that there is death and destruction in the world. Detachment is a necessary tool to prevent insanity and promote learning. Paglia defined wisdom as, “philosophical detachment from life’s disasters.” This detachment is the foundation for knowledge, even if it does take the form of a soap ad.
Postman argued that reading was a method of conditioning children to sit still. This would prove beneficial in the classroom by enhance learning, particularly in the areas of science and engineering. The opposing argument emphasized the changing sensory responses of children. Those who grew up with television have been programmed to access different parts of the brain when required. There are different levels to which people are naturally disposed to a sedentary lifestyle. Some are more active then others, physically, and cognitively. Those born in later generations are more cognitively active then those born prior to WWII. They exhibit “multi-layered thinking,” or the ability to apply a certain emphasis on one task while passively doing others. I am engaging in this practice currently, listening to the Goo Goo Dolls while I am writing this blog.
Both Paglia and Postman had presented their views on the way we process knowledge. It is important however, to also examine the most efficient means for presenting this knowledge. Among all the conflicting perspectives there was one point of agreement. Both thinkers felt that there is a need to, “reinforce logo centric and Apollonian sides of our culture in the schools. It is time for enlightened repression of the children.” Essentially, schools must emphasize the features of ancient Greek mythology, and the systems of thought produced by the enlightenment. Truth is currently repressed rather then objectified through logic.
The educational system of today hardly reflects the teachings of early philosophers. Higher education is far too narrowly focused in the disciplines. The standards of society have risen so that a college diploma is the equivalence of the high school diploma ten years ago. In order to excel in a field a master’s diploma is almost required. As we are more educated however, I think we lose sight of life’s discontinuity. The more specific knowledge is, the lesser the chance of encountering a different disciplinary perspective. I agree in that society should emphasize the cognitive structure of history’s greatest thinkers, and reproduce it. I fear that as society’s standards increase, the more we are simply reading a book from left to right, and going through the motions. The box that we are supposed to think outside of is simply getting bigger. Innovation and critical thinking are compromised with specialization. It is the unexpected obstacle that teaches us most efficiently.
WORKS CITED:
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Political Blog #3
The most exciting moment of any competition is that when a winner is decided. The presidential election is no exception. In order to gain the presidency, a candidate must gain a total of 270 electoral votes. Many times however, networks attempt to “call” a projected winner prior to acquiring these votes. There are many consequences to this early projection, primarily voter discouragement. If voters have not yet gone to the polls when a winner is supposedly decided, they simply will stay home. This was the case in the 1980 election when networks projected Ronald Reagan was to defeat Jimmy Carter. The numbers were based on poll results from eastern states, while the western polls had not yet closed. Consequently, there was an estimated loss of 2 percent of Californian voters (Steinberg 2008). In addition to the presidential ballot, there are other important elements of legislation on the ticket. One such example would be the vote for slot machines in the state of Maryland. If voter turn out was reduced there would be a substantial loss in votes that could have shifted legislation one way or the other.
When CNN was first founded its large success grew from the 24 hour news cycle. Continuous information was being brought into the home. The network’s ability to bring the most up-to-date information appealed to the masses. Competition then developed between stations to bring breaking stories to viewers first, before all other networks. This competition has infiltrated recent elections by encouraging networks to be the first to project a winner. An early decision can create positive and negative possibilities for the network. A network’s image and prestige could be easily compromised by calling the wrong candidate. While at the same time, they could appear to have the most updated information. In the 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore, networks incorrectly projected the state of Florida to be awarded to Gore. A large controversy then ensued that resulted in a presidential victory for Bush. The networks were therefore wrong and have since taken steps to ensure accuracy in projecting a winner.
An article in the New York Times analyzed when network producers felt it was appropriate to share projection information with the public. All networks were having debates about how relying too heavily on exit polls could be costly. The senior vice president of CBS news stated that, “meeting the minimum threshold of electoral votes could be clear as soon as 8 p.m. At such a moment, the network could share its preliminary projection with viewers” (Steinberg 2008). ABC felt that the network might have an indication early however there is a difference between feeling and reporting that indication. NBC stated very clearly that, “When a candidate gets 270 electoral votes, they’re the next president” (Steinberg 2008). It is clear that Networks wanted to make a projection off facts, rather then assumptions, and that is just what happened.
Barack Obama obtained a commanding lead in electoral votes by gaining key states such as Pennsylvania and especially Ohio. No Republican president has ever won the office without winning Ohio, and the 2008 election was no exception (CNN 2008). The 20 electoral votes gained from this state were an important push toward the 270 required for victory. This was crucial because Ohio was a republican state that turned democratic this election, while no democratic states had turned over to McCain. The Obama victory in Ohio was projected at 9:38pm however the official winner was not announced until 11:00pm, when the 270 electoral votes were officially in. Networks displayed more responsibility in 2008 with winner/state projections. The distinction between “too close to call,” and “too early to call” was made on NBC. This allowed viewers to stay informed with many state’s numbers and make individual assumptions, without the networks providing misinformation.
There are similarities and differences that exist between the elections of today and those of our founding fathers. Election Day is in November because in rural times, crops were already harvested. Also, Tuesday was the chosen day to vote because people needed time to travel to the polls. Sunday was reserved for worship, therefore Monday was the travel day and elections took place on Tuesday. This election date has remained constant for hundreds of years. The way in which we vote however has dramatically changed. Hand written ballots have been replaced with punch cards, which were then replaced by touch screens. Technology allowed for projections to be calculated much earlier in the 2008 election. There are often “kinks” that result from using new technology. The Networks seem to have worked them out in past elections, and are now more cautious. Thankfully, this can only benefit the legislative process.
WORKS CITED:
CNN. 2008. Election Center. CNNPolitics. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/ (accessed November 4, 2008).
Steinberg, Jacques. 2008. Networks May Call Race Before Voting Is Complete. The New York Times, November 3, 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/us/politics/04network.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss (accessed November 4, 2008).
When CNN was first founded its large success grew from the 24 hour news cycle. Continuous information was being brought into the home. The network’s ability to bring the most up-to-date information appealed to the masses. Competition then developed between stations to bring breaking stories to viewers first, before all other networks. This competition has infiltrated recent elections by encouraging networks to be the first to project a winner. An early decision can create positive and negative possibilities for the network. A network’s image and prestige could be easily compromised by calling the wrong candidate. While at the same time, they could appear to have the most updated information. In the 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore, networks incorrectly projected the state of Florida to be awarded to Gore. A large controversy then ensued that resulted in a presidential victory for Bush. The networks were therefore wrong and have since taken steps to ensure accuracy in projecting a winner.
An article in the New York Times analyzed when network producers felt it was appropriate to share projection information with the public. All networks were having debates about how relying too heavily on exit polls could be costly. The senior vice president of CBS news stated that, “meeting the minimum threshold of electoral votes could be clear as soon as 8 p.m. At such a moment, the network could share its preliminary projection with viewers” (Steinberg 2008). ABC felt that the network might have an indication early however there is a difference between feeling and reporting that indication. NBC stated very clearly that, “When a candidate gets 270 electoral votes, they’re the next president” (Steinberg 2008). It is clear that Networks wanted to make a projection off facts, rather then assumptions, and that is just what happened.
Barack Obama obtained a commanding lead in electoral votes by gaining key states such as Pennsylvania and especially Ohio. No Republican president has ever won the office without winning Ohio, and the 2008 election was no exception (CNN 2008). The 20 electoral votes gained from this state were an important push toward the 270 required for victory. This was crucial because Ohio was a republican state that turned democratic this election, while no democratic states had turned over to McCain. The Obama victory in Ohio was projected at 9:38pm however the official winner was not announced until 11:00pm, when the 270 electoral votes were officially in. Networks displayed more responsibility in 2008 with winner/state projections. The distinction between “too close to call,” and “too early to call” was made on NBC. This allowed viewers to stay informed with many state’s numbers and make individual assumptions, without the networks providing misinformation.
There are similarities and differences that exist between the elections of today and those of our founding fathers. Election Day is in November because in rural times, crops were already harvested. Also, Tuesday was the chosen day to vote because people needed time to travel to the polls. Sunday was reserved for worship, therefore Monday was the travel day and elections took place on Tuesday. This election date has remained constant for hundreds of years. The way in which we vote however has dramatically changed. Hand written ballots have been replaced with punch cards, which were then replaced by touch screens. Technology allowed for projections to be calculated much earlier in the 2008 election. There are often “kinks” that result from using new technology. The Networks seem to have worked them out in past elections, and are now more cautious. Thankfully, this can only benefit the legislative process.
WORKS CITED:
CNN. 2008. Election Center. CNNPolitics. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/ (accessed November 4, 2008).
Steinberg, Jacques. 2008. Networks May Call Race Before Voting Is Complete. The New York Times, November 3, 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/us/politics/04network.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss (accessed November 4, 2008).
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Blog #3
Most Americans know what is implied by “keeping up with the Joneses.” It’s a statement that reflects the desire to maintain a similar, or better, socio-economic status as one’s peers. In the past few decades this level of satisfaction has dramatically changed, largely due to the effects of mass media. There exists a positive relationship between this escalated need for satisfaction and every day consumerism.
There are different means through which the media works to dictate satisfaction. In the 1950’s there was an emphasis on domestic life. Women were responsible for cleaning the home and caring for the children. They became the targets of advertisements that promoted an easier lifestyle. Appliances that eased manual labor, such as the washing machine became very popular. This began a new era in which the media emphasized self indulgence opposed to need based spending. After the washing machine was purchased women had more time to relax, and possibly watch more programs. Television began to dictate what should be consumed in order to remain in a decent social standing. This was done largely through shows, in which there was a dilemma that was eventually solved by some sort of appliance. This idea of consumption has continued into the present day. In order to remain successful it is necessary to have the same luxuries as those we see on television. People today are often exposed to an unrealistic standard of living. In general, the regular American is working more hours and is less satisfied with life. The media sends the message that personal success is measured by ownership. It is simply impossible for the masses to ever achieve the media’s depicted levels of success.
Jackson Lears’ excerpt Advertising and the Idea of Mass Society brings attention to the “developing rhetoric of “mass man.” Essentially, there are many struggles faced by advertisers regarding their target audience, and methods for delivery. It is the fantasy atmosphere surrounding a product that appeals to the consumer, not necessarily the product itself. “People are duped. Seeking a pleasurable escape from the workaday world, they find it in a deceptive dream world which is no dream at all but a sales pitch in disguise” (Williams 1982 p.169). Advertisements, therefore appeal to this sense of desire that is unattainable for many. Success in terms of the media is “rationality for the few, irrationality for the many” (Lears 1994 p.201). The majorities of consumers are financially unable to purchase the product but are captivated by the atmosphere. Those that are financially capable then purchase the product as a status symbol, to display their apparent success.
Magazines are included in media, and therefore follow the same path as television. It does not matter if a person reads Sports Illustrated, Cosmo, Glamour or Enquire the message is the same. Advertisements promise fantasy and an escape to a dream world where the consumer meets the standards of success. Once the product is purchased however, the consumer is back to square one. Success can be measured differently however it always reverts back to consumerism. If a person’s finds success through a fit, muscular body, then it is necessary that he own the latest in home gym equipment. Images are very powerful because, given the context, they are able to send a non-verbal message to the viewer. Semiotics studies the interactions between a symbol, and the message it sends to the viewer. An easily identified example is eye glasses, which will make a character or model appear intelligent. Books are also effective in portraying higher education. A picture is said to be worth a thousand words because an images’ complexity captures meaning far easier then text.
The October 2008 issue of Men’s Health featured a double page Dolce and Gabbana ad. This is an Italian clothing line that is grossly over priced. A pair of jeans costs roughly $500 while a blazer is over $1000. This is not the typical price range for the average consumer. The ad features actor/model Matthew McConoughey posing in a white button down shirt, the ad cuts off at his abdomen. His hair is gelled back and he is not cleanly shaven. The background features an incandescent room that is dimly lit. McConoughey’s white shirt contrasts the background in combination with white lettering reading, “The new fragrance for men DOLCE AND GABBANA the one.” Flipping to this page, the viewer is exposed to a theme of elegance. The model is gazing at the viewer with a welcoming pose. The ad offers a luxurious lifestyle that can only be achieved through the purchase of this cologne. It almost feels that purchasing this product will break down the imaginary boarder between the real world and allow the consumer to enter into the magazine. Those with high incomes are drawn to the name of the product “the one.” This provides individuality and sets Dolce and Gabbana cologne above all others. The longer I focused on this ad the more enticing it seemed. The soft colors made it appear almost hypnotizing and secluded, like a peaceful utopian world. The multiple ads on the following pages seemed busy and stressful. Today’s society is very demanding and this ad touched on the desire for a calm, luxurious lifestyle.
Images provide society with very powerful messages. Messages that dictate consumer behavior and what it means to be successful in this country. The idea of escaping reality is a common desire that appeals to many. This has provided a foundation for advertising ever since the introduction of department stores in 1852 (Williams 1982 p.172). Technological changes often affect the surface of the media, however the underlying messages remain the same. There will always be a positive correlation between the media’s definition of success and consumer behavior.
WORKS CITED:
Lears, Jackson. 1994. Advertising and the Idea of Mass Society. Communication in History. Pearson Education Inc. Boston MA.
Williams, Rosalynd. 1982 Dream Worlds. Communication in History. Pearson Education Inc. Boston MA.
There are different means through which the media works to dictate satisfaction. In the 1950’s there was an emphasis on domestic life. Women were responsible for cleaning the home and caring for the children. They became the targets of advertisements that promoted an easier lifestyle. Appliances that eased manual labor, such as the washing machine became very popular. This began a new era in which the media emphasized self indulgence opposed to need based spending. After the washing machine was purchased women had more time to relax, and possibly watch more programs. Television began to dictate what should be consumed in order to remain in a decent social standing. This was done largely through shows, in which there was a dilemma that was eventually solved by some sort of appliance. This idea of consumption has continued into the present day. In order to remain successful it is necessary to have the same luxuries as those we see on television. People today are often exposed to an unrealistic standard of living. In general, the regular American is working more hours and is less satisfied with life. The media sends the message that personal success is measured by ownership. It is simply impossible for the masses to ever achieve the media’s depicted levels of success.
Jackson Lears’ excerpt Advertising and the Idea of Mass Society brings attention to the “developing rhetoric of “mass man.” Essentially, there are many struggles faced by advertisers regarding their target audience, and methods for delivery. It is the fantasy atmosphere surrounding a product that appeals to the consumer, not necessarily the product itself. “People are duped. Seeking a pleasurable escape from the workaday world, they find it in a deceptive dream world which is no dream at all but a sales pitch in disguise” (Williams 1982 p.169). Advertisements, therefore appeal to this sense of desire that is unattainable for many. Success in terms of the media is “rationality for the few, irrationality for the many” (Lears 1994 p.201). The majorities of consumers are financially unable to purchase the product but are captivated by the atmosphere. Those that are financially capable then purchase the product as a status symbol, to display their apparent success.
Magazines are included in media, and therefore follow the same path as television. It does not matter if a person reads Sports Illustrated, Cosmo, Glamour or Enquire the message is the same. Advertisements promise fantasy and an escape to a dream world where the consumer meets the standards of success. Once the product is purchased however, the consumer is back to square one. Success can be measured differently however it always reverts back to consumerism. If a person’s finds success through a fit, muscular body, then it is necessary that he own the latest in home gym equipment. Images are very powerful because, given the context, they are able to send a non-verbal message to the viewer. Semiotics studies the interactions between a symbol, and the message it sends to the viewer. An easily identified example is eye glasses, which will make a character or model appear intelligent. Books are also effective in portraying higher education. A picture is said to be worth a thousand words because an images’ complexity captures meaning far easier then text.
The October 2008 issue of Men’s Health featured a double page Dolce and Gabbana ad. This is an Italian clothing line that is grossly over priced. A pair of jeans costs roughly $500 while a blazer is over $1000. This is not the typical price range for the average consumer. The ad features actor/model Matthew McConoughey posing in a white button down shirt, the ad cuts off at his abdomen. His hair is gelled back and he is not cleanly shaven. The background features an incandescent room that is dimly lit. McConoughey’s white shirt contrasts the background in combination with white lettering reading, “The new fragrance for men DOLCE AND GABBANA the one.” Flipping to this page, the viewer is exposed to a theme of elegance. The model is gazing at the viewer with a welcoming pose. The ad offers a luxurious lifestyle that can only be achieved through the purchase of this cologne. It almost feels that purchasing this product will break down the imaginary boarder between the real world and allow the consumer to enter into the magazine. Those with high incomes are drawn to the name of the product “the one.” This provides individuality and sets Dolce and Gabbana cologne above all others. The longer I focused on this ad the more enticing it seemed. The soft colors made it appear almost hypnotizing and secluded, like a peaceful utopian world. The multiple ads on the following pages seemed busy and stressful. Today’s society is very demanding and this ad touched on the desire for a calm, luxurious lifestyle.
Images provide society with very powerful messages. Messages that dictate consumer behavior and what it means to be successful in this country. The idea of escaping reality is a common desire that appeals to many. This has provided a foundation for advertising ever since the introduction of department stores in 1852 (Williams 1982 p.172). Technological changes often affect the surface of the media, however the underlying messages remain the same. There will always be a positive correlation between the media’s definition of success and consumer behavior.
WORKS CITED:
Lears, Jackson. 1994. Advertising and the Idea of Mass Society. Communication in History. Pearson Education Inc. Boston MA.
Williams, Rosalynd. 1982 Dream Worlds. Communication in History. Pearson Education Inc. Boston MA.
Monday, September 29, 2008
Political Blog #2
The first political debate between Barock Obama and John McCain progressed in the usual format. Both candidates managed to spend a significant amount of time reflecting on the concerns of the nation, bashing their opponent’s policies, and verbally tip-toeing around how they will personally make a difference in our nation. The hour and thirty-four minutes flew by. As expected, both candidates pulled their “trump card” at one point or another. McCain represented experience and referred to himself as a “maverick” due to his disagreement with the Republican Party on various issues. While Obama allowed himself to be seen as the voice of change, a candidate who understands the people.
Both Obama and McCain were victorious in different areas of the debate. The opening point questioned both candidates’ position on the current financial crisis. I feel Obama was better rehearsed on this issue. He drew attention to the everyday working American, "the nurse, the teacher, the police officer who, frankly, at the end of each month have got a little financial crisis going on" (Wills 2008). Many Americans feel politicians are very distant to middle class life. The Obama campaign ran with this approach when McCain was unable to recollect the amount of houses he owns, which is seven. I’m slightly surprised that this topic did not emerge while discussing homeowner concerns. At any point I half expected Obama to say something in the nature of, “how would you know the concerns of Americans who fear losing their homes? You have seven!” Obama instead remained professional and political.
Tax concerns were another debated issue. McCain stressed the importance of lowering taxes for large companies. His idea was that if companies can operate anywhere in the world why come or stay in America when the business tax is 35%? By lowering the business tax, fortune 500 companies will be enticed to operate in the states, increasing jobs and aiding the injured economy. Obama however, stressed the fact that only so many tax cuts are possible, and it is better to give them to the people that already need some relief. There are also many loop-holes that businesses find to avoid such taxes, therefore they are not suffering. This was a successful approach because the ratio of regular Americans to businessmen in fortune 500 companies could severely favor Obama on Nov 4th.
The foreign policy round went overall to McCain with small glimpses of hope for Obama. McCain’s many years of “experience” was emphasized as he reflected on the faults of Vietnam, which he was indeed part of. He stated that Obama was naïve, and went on to clarify terms such as “strategy” for his opponent. He also attacked Obama for not wanting to give President Bush funding for the Iraqi invasion. Obama’s response was that he did not oppose funding if there was a time constraint. He did not want to give a blank check to the president. This is where I felt Obama looked the strongest on the topic of foreign policy. Although both candidates continued to verbally punch each other I believe this was a point where Obama threw up a successful block. I feel McCain dominated the rest of the foreign policy issues.
My opinion of the debate was also shared by the general public and the author. “The polls gave Obama a modest lead and indicated he was viewed more favorably than his rival when it came to dealing with the economy. But the same surveys show McCain favored by far on foreign policy” (Wills 2008). If there had to be an overall winner I believe Obama was victorious. There were two different instances when Obama defended himself by clarifying the accusations made by McCain. This was seen in the area of taxation, pointing out the loopholes Fortune 500 companies jump through, as well as his position on funding the war in Iraq. Many people, including myself, believe politics to be a continuous battle of verbal manipulation. The fundamental approach for many campaigns is to twist the opponent’s words as to make them the ‘bad guy.” The only difference during the debate is that it allows the candidates to expose all the dirt they have created on the opponent in a little over and hour and a half. Obama’s defense to many attacks enabled the American people to understand a larger portion of the issue, opposed to just what is being questioned. McCain seemed to babble on in conventional political jargon, firing away accusations and contributing little.
I watched the debate coverage online, however the visual picture was really unnecessary. McCain and Obama have distinct differences that distinguish them from one another. Obama is a 47 year old, multiracial democrat, while McCain is a 72 year old white republican. Without a visual, it is easy to tell which candidate is speaking. If Obama wins he will be “among the youngest presidents in history,” while McCain would be, “the oldest to win the office” (Klein 2008). This age difference is reflected when the Obama campaign refers to this election as the vote between the past and the future. I believe both men were portrayed equally by the media throughout the debate. I’m unsure what channels aired the debate, however following its conclusion it was readily available online. I feel new technology will greatly increase the awareness of voters as to candidate’s policies. The unknowing voter has the means to research a candidate and instantly view important videos, such as the debate rerun. The next two debates will take place in Nashville, and New York on Oct 7th and Oct 15th (Wills 2008). On November 4th America will decide between the economy and change, or foreign policy and experience.
WORKS CITED:
Klein, Ezra. 2008. The Obama-McCain Age Gap That Matters. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-klein1-2008jun01,0,2168608.story (accessed September 27th).
Wills, Christopher. 2008. Obama, McCain argue over war, taxes in 1st debate. Myway news. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080927/D93F1KL01.html (accessed September 27th).
Both Obama and McCain were victorious in different areas of the debate. The opening point questioned both candidates’ position on the current financial crisis. I feel Obama was better rehearsed on this issue. He drew attention to the everyday working American, "the nurse, the teacher, the police officer who, frankly, at the end of each month have got a little financial crisis going on" (Wills 2008). Many Americans feel politicians are very distant to middle class life. The Obama campaign ran with this approach when McCain was unable to recollect the amount of houses he owns, which is seven. I’m slightly surprised that this topic did not emerge while discussing homeowner concerns. At any point I half expected Obama to say something in the nature of, “how would you know the concerns of Americans who fear losing their homes? You have seven!” Obama instead remained professional and political.
Tax concerns were another debated issue. McCain stressed the importance of lowering taxes for large companies. His idea was that if companies can operate anywhere in the world why come or stay in America when the business tax is 35%? By lowering the business tax, fortune 500 companies will be enticed to operate in the states, increasing jobs and aiding the injured economy. Obama however, stressed the fact that only so many tax cuts are possible, and it is better to give them to the people that already need some relief. There are also many loop-holes that businesses find to avoid such taxes, therefore they are not suffering. This was a successful approach because the ratio of regular Americans to businessmen in fortune 500 companies could severely favor Obama on Nov 4th.
The foreign policy round went overall to McCain with small glimpses of hope for Obama. McCain’s many years of “experience” was emphasized as he reflected on the faults of Vietnam, which he was indeed part of. He stated that Obama was naïve, and went on to clarify terms such as “strategy” for his opponent. He also attacked Obama for not wanting to give President Bush funding for the Iraqi invasion. Obama’s response was that he did not oppose funding if there was a time constraint. He did not want to give a blank check to the president. This is where I felt Obama looked the strongest on the topic of foreign policy. Although both candidates continued to verbally punch each other I believe this was a point where Obama threw up a successful block. I feel McCain dominated the rest of the foreign policy issues.
My opinion of the debate was also shared by the general public and the author. “The polls gave Obama a modest lead and indicated he was viewed more favorably than his rival when it came to dealing with the economy. But the same surveys show McCain favored by far on foreign policy” (Wills 2008). If there had to be an overall winner I believe Obama was victorious. There were two different instances when Obama defended himself by clarifying the accusations made by McCain. This was seen in the area of taxation, pointing out the loopholes Fortune 500 companies jump through, as well as his position on funding the war in Iraq. Many people, including myself, believe politics to be a continuous battle of verbal manipulation. The fundamental approach for many campaigns is to twist the opponent’s words as to make them the ‘bad guy.” The only difference during the debate is that it allows the candidates to expose all the dirt they have created on the opponent in a little over and hour and a half. Obama’s defense to many attacks enabled the American people to understand a larger portion of the issue, opposed to just what is being questioned. McCain seemed to babble on in conventional political jargon, firing away accusations and contributing little.
I watched the debate coverage online, however the visual picture was really unnecessary. McCain and Obama have distinct differences that distinguish them from one another. Obama is a 47 year old, multiracial democrat, while McCain is a 72 year old white republican. Without a visual, it is easy to tell which candidate is speaking. If Obama wins he will be “among the youngest presidents in history,” while McCain would be, “the oldest to win the office” (Klein 2008). This age difference is reflected when the Obama campaign refers to this election as the vote between the past and the future. I believe both men were portrayed equally by the media throughout the debate. I’m unsure what channels aired the debate, however following its conclusion it was readily available online. I feel new technology will greatly increase the awareness of voters as to candidate’s policies. The unknowing voter has the means to research a candidate and instantly view important videos, such as the debate rerun. The next two debates will take place in Nashville, and New York on Oct 7th and Oct 15th (Wills 2008). On November 4th America will decide between the economy and change, or foreign policy and experience.
WORKS CITED:
Klein, Ezra. 2008. The Obama-McCain Age Gap That Matters. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-klein1-2008jun01,0,2168608.story (accessed September 27th).
Wills, Christopher. 2008. Obama, McCain argue over war, taxes in 1st debate. Myway news. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080927/D93F1KL01.html (accessed September 27th).
Monday, September 22, 2008
writing vs. speech
Technological advances in today’s society have furthered the traditional roles of speech and writing. While both are extremely important, I feel that oral communication is much more effective, therefore leading to its superiority over writing.
There are many differences between speech and writing. Speech is temporary and directed toward a specific audience, while writing is permanent and written for an unknown reader. The permanence of writing is often what brings people to significantly admire it, after all, it is how we have been able to gather knowledge about previous cultures. It is therefore impossible to say that writing is no longer of importance. Speech however, is what brings about impact and change. So what is more important, permanence of thought, or its impact? I do not believe that there will be a problem preserving the culture of the 21st century. Three thousand years from now, people will not be reading our papers on environmental concerns. Instead they will question what we were thinking buying a case of disposable bottles of water every week, and throwing them into landfills. It is what we do that will concern future generations, not necessarily what we say. Our actions speak louder then words, and speech significantly influences our actions.
Today, writing can be used as a shield to deflect meaning. An author may compose a work and leave its meaning open to interpretation. The meaning of a statement can be altered if looked at differently or taken out of context. This is the case with the recent political campaigns. Oral communication however, requires the speaker to think critically and spontaneously. Through speech the truth is attained, while writing can lead the reader a stray. This idea is reflected through the importance placed on job interviews. A résumé, or the written word, can only get a person so far. An interview that requires oral communication is a true test of a person’s character and intelligence. Through speech we are held accountable for what we say, and do not have time to formulate and print rebuttals if ever questioned.
I feel a recent phenomenon that reflects this accountability is “drunk texting.” In the last few years of college I have witnessed that “drunk-dialing” has taken a new form in “drunk texting.” While inhibitions are lowered people are inclined to act irresponsibly and often harass their latest crush, or mouth off to someone that has annoyed them recently. Rather then calling the person I have noticed that texting is now the chosen path to harassment. I believe this is for many reasons including: conversation can take place in the presence of others while remaining discrete, there will be a record of what was said in the morning, and there is even less accountability for what is said. The first two reasons are self explanatory, however the last is the main point. Through texting the writer is given complete power to say whatever he feels necessary. There is no argument until the next incoming message arrives, if ever. Additionally, there is always the excuse of “someone stole my phone.” If something completely inappropriate slips out of your fingertips then automatically it wasn’t you, and you cannot be held accountable. If that same inappropriate statement slips out of your mouth however, that same excuse cannot hold up.
Different forms of writing have emerged as technology has changed including blogs, aim conversations, text messaging, and e-mailing. Although blogs and e-mail are used in the professional field, they do not escape amateur writers. Each new form of writing has become closer to that of speech and farther away from traditional writing. Through conversation it is possible to hear tones underlying sarcasm, or see facial expressions that convey a message. There are now certain rules to understanding this new diction. For example: if a person writes in all capital letters they seem to be YELLING, or feel VERY strongly about their meaning. Similarly, various faces can indicate mood , while abbreviations help convey meaning. Newer forms of writing are able to show the persona of the amateur writer, opposed to just their meaning.
The expressions and tones that coincide with oral communication enable the audience to easier commit the speech to memory. I experience this first hand within the classroom. When a professor uses power points (that are often on blackboard) he tends to drone on monotonously, adding very little to the visual information already provided. Additionally, there is this notion that when word for word information is provided for our convenience on blackboard, we tend to pay attention less. On the other hand, if a professor lectures and does not allow the class to take notes, they are forced to pay attention in order to obtain the information. “A master of written Greek, Plato feared that written language would undermine human memory capacities” (Gardner 2008). From the time we were small children, we have been recording information that could be referred to later. The most learning that occurs in our lives takes place when we are very young, before the introduction of writing. When we were babies we absorbed the words spoken to us and thought about them in our little minds. We did not hear the word “daddy” and write down his characteristics in order to identify him later. We processed the information taught orally and learned from it.
In February 1942, Roosevelt urged Americans to spread out a map during his radio "fireside chat" so that they might better understand the geography of battle” (Jacoby 2008). Roosevelt used this speech to communicate with the people and impress upon them the vast distances necessary to ship supplies. If he has written this information down and sent it to every American house this information would not have had the same effect. Similarly, the spreading of Martin Luther’s 95 Thesis was greatly influenced by the printing press. However “Illiterates were attracted to Luther’s ideas through visual devices and oral communications. Personal relationships, oral communication, printing and writing, and institutions: each played a part, separately and interactively” (Harvy 2007 116). It is impossible to attribute the protestant reformation to the printing press alone. If Martin Luther had written the 95 Thesis and kept it to himself, history would be different.
WORKS CITED:
Gardner, Howard. The End of Literacy? Don’t Stop Reading. Washington Post; February 17, 2008.
http://blackboard.umbc.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_37304_1 (accessed September 20th 2008).
Graff, Harvy J. 2007. Early Modern Literacies. Person Education Inc. pg116
Jacoby, Susan. The Dumbing of America. Washington Post; February 17, 2008. http://blackboard.umbc.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_37304_1 (accessed September 21st 2008).
There are many differences between speech and writing. Speech is temporary and directed toward a specific audience, while writing is permanent and written for an unknown reader. The permanence of writing is often what brings people to significantly admire it, after all, it is how we have been able to gather knowledge about previous cultures. It is therefore impossible to say that writing is no longer of importance. Speech however, is what brings about impact and change. So what is more important, permanence of thought, or its impact? I do not believe that there will be a problem preserving the culture of the 21st century. Three thousand years from now, people will not be reading our papers on environmental concerns. Instead they will question what we were thinking buying a case of disposable bottles of water every week, and throwing them into landfills. It is what we do that will concern future generations, not necessarily what we say. Our actions speak louder then words, and speech significantly influences our actions.
Today, writing can be used as a shield to deflect meaning. An author may compose a work and leave its meaning open to interpretation. The meaning of a statement can be altered if looked at differently or taken out of context. This is the case with the recent political campaigns. Oral communication however, requires the speaker to think critically and spontaneously. Through speech the truth is attained, while writing can lead the reader a stray. This idea is reflected through the importance placed on job interviews. A résumé, or the written word, can only get a person so far. An interview that requires oral communication is a true test of a person’s character and intelligence. Through speech we are held accountable for what we say, and do not have time to formulate and print rebuttals if ever questioned.
I feel a recent phenomenon that reflects this accountability is “drunk texting.” In the last few years of college I have witnessed that “drunk-dialing” has taken a new form in “drunk texting.” While inhibitions are lowered people are inclined to act irresponsibly and often harass their latest crush, or mouth off to someone that has annoyed them recently. Rather then calling the person I have noticed that texting is now the chosen path to harassment. I believe this is for many reasons including: conversation can take place in the presence of others while remaining discrete, there will be a record of what was said in the morning, and there is even less accountability for what is said. The first two reasons are self explanatory, however the last is the main point. Through texting the writer is given complete power to say whatever he feels necessary. There is no argument until the next incoming message arrives, if ever. Additionally, there is always the excuse of “someone stole my phone.” If something completely inappropriate slips out of your fingertips then automatically it wasn’t you, and you cannot be held accountable. If that same inappropriate statement slips out of your mouth however, that same excuse cannot hold up.
Different forms of writing have emerged as technology has changed including blogs, aim conversations, text messaging, and e-mailing. Although blogs and e-mail are used in the professional field, they do not escape amateur writers. Each new form of writing has become closer to that of speech and farther away from traditional writing. Through conversation it is possible to hear tones underlying sarcasm, or see facial expressions that convey a message. There are now certain rules to understanding this new diction. For example: if a person writes in all capital letters they seem to be YELLING, or feel VERY strongly about their meaning. Similarly, various faces can indicate mood , while abbreviations help convey meaning. Newer forms of writing are able to show the persona of the amateur writer, opposed to just their meaning.
The expressions and tones that coincide with oral communication enable the audience to easier commit the speech to memory. I experience this first hand within the classroom. When a professor uses power points (that are often on blackboard) he tends to drone on monotonously, adding very little to the visual information already provided. Additionally, there is this notion that when word for word information is provided for our convenience on blackboard, we tend to pay attention less. On the other hand, if a professor lectures and does not allow the class to take notes, they are forced to pay attention in order to obtain the information. “A master of written Greek, Plato feared that written language would undermine human memory capacities” (Gardner 2008). From the time we were small children, we have been recording information that could be referred to later. The most learning that occurs in our lives takes place when we are very young, before the introduction of writing. When we were babies we absorbed the words spoken to us and thought about them in our little minds. We did not hear the word “daddy” and write down his characteristics in order to identify him later. We processed the information taught orally and learned from it.
In February 1942, Roosevelt urged Americans to spread out a map during his radio "fireside chat" so that they might better understand the geography of battle” (Jacoby 2008). Roosevelt used this speech to communicate with the people and impress upon them the vast distances necessary to ship supplies. If he has written this information down and sent it to every American house this information would not have had the same effect. Similarly, the spreading of Martin Luther’s 95 Thesis was greatly influenced by the printing press. However “Illiterates were attracted to Luther’s ideas through visual devices and oral communications. Personal relationships, oral communication, printing and writing, and institutions: each played a part, separately and interactively” (Harvy 2007 116). It is impossible to attribute the protestant reformation to the printing press alone. If Martin Luther had written the 95 Thesis and kept it to himself, history would be different.
WORKS CITED:
Gardner, Howard. The End of Literacy? Don’t Stop Reading. Washington Post; February 17, 2008.
http://blackboard.umbc.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_37304_1 (accessed September 20th 2008).
Graff, Harvy J. 2007. Early Modern Literacies. Person Education Inc. pg116
Jacoby, Susan. The Dumbing of America. Washington Post; February 17, 2008. http://blackboard.umbc.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_37304_1 (accessed September 21st 2008).
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Political Blog #1
Recently, the public’s attention has shifted toward the Republican Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin. In an effort to learn more about her policies, ABC’s Charlie Gibson conducted a series of three interviews. The first interview, conducted on September 11th, was a reflection of presidential nominee John McCain’s policies on national security and foreign policy through the mouth of Palin. Later in the day, during the second interview, she stated that she and McCain “agreed to disagree” on the concern over global warming and energy policies. She emphasized her belief that global warming is not ENTIRELY man-made. (Goldman 2008). The word “entirely” was emphasized as a means of clarifying a previous statement that read, "I'm not one though who would attribute [global warming] to being man-made" (Goldman 2008). Throughout the blog, author Russell Goldman followed the interviews closely and provided a decent analysis of the candidate from a relatively impartial point of view. The main point that lacked objectivity would be the emphasis placed on one single word, and the way it seemed to apparently alter Palin’s position.
I find it interesting that such a position is held by the governor of
Essentially, the Drudge Report focused on Palin’s change in position throughout the campaign. To say that global warming is not man-made is completely ridiculous. It would mean that human activity has not had an effect on the temperature change, despite all scientific research proving otherwise. The claim that global warming is not ENTIRELY man made attempts to suggest that humans have had a part in this phenomenon. So which is it? Have we or have we not effected global warming? Palin has made statements supporting both, therefore it is necessary to surpass her statements and examine her actions. She has proposed drilling in
Goldman, Russell. 2008. Palin Takes Hard Line on National Security, Softens Stance on Global Warming. The Drudge Report. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5778018&page=1 (accessed
Weise,
Sunday, September 7, 2008
MCS222 Assignment one
My name is Emily Thompson and this is my first blog, created for assignment one in MCS 222. My hometown is the city of Niagara Falls, New York and the primary reason I attend UMBC is to play softball. I would say that my relationship with the media is fairly strong. In my spare time I typically spend time surfing the Internet on sites such as facebook, and using instant messenger. Academics and athletics contribute to my Internet use. I check blackboard at least once everyday, while also checking my e-mail numerous times. All updates and changes in my schedule for class and softball are made public though e-mail. I watch movies to relax and recently more box sets of my favorites television shows have made their way onto my DVD rack. I listen to music both on the radio as well as on my laptop. I enjoy hearing new music, however continual repeats of the same songs leads me to turn on a CD or my ipod. In recent years, technological advances have led to the large expansion of media. Items such as laptops, cell phones, and ipods have made their way into our everyday lives. Changes in technology have paved the way for a change in the way people live their everyday lives. We are constantly connected. Communication is no longer limited by time or location thanks to cell phones and networks that apparently consist of hundreds of people in hardhats walking around ensuring good service. Im amazed how much the media has changed within the last few years. VHS tapes have been replaced my DVD's. Data used to be stored on 3.5 floppy disks, which were replaced by CD's which were then replaced by jump-drives. The Internet was once extremely slow and during connection made an extremely terrible dial tone sound. Today, I have a wireless router in my apartment that provides a high speed signal. When i was younger the only hope of hearing a song that was not yet released on CD was to listen constantly to the radio and if i were lucky, and prepared, record it onto a cassette tape. How far illegal downloading has come in a few short years. Essentially, the media has dramatically changed, impacting every aspect of society. Politics, academics, economics, and advertising are only a few areas that have changed. I am really excited to closely examine the relationship of the media and the way it shapes society.
The political blog i will be following is the Drudge Report: http://www.drudgereport.com/
The political blog i will be following is the Drudge Report: http://www.drudgereport.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
